|
Calvary Herald THE WEB MAGAZINE OF CALVARY REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH |
|
I n O u r D a i l y L i v e s |
01/31/07 |
|
by Byron Snapp |
|
Should we
be surprised? At this year’s Sundance
Film Festival a documentary, entitled “Zoo”, on bestiality will reportedly be
shown. No one should view this as
progress towards great freedom or new frontiers. Anyone who has this view or teaches others that
such a film denotes moral progress has overlooked historical testimony. The Bible in Lev. 18:23-30 and Deut. 27:21 warns
against bestiality. This warning was
issued because the Israelites were moving into a pagan culture. They would be tempted to follow pagan practices.
We should
not be surprised to see media attention turned to this practice in our day.
In the
teaching of evolution man is just an animal.
He has evolved from lower forms of animal life. Thus what is wrong with bestiality? Is there any difference in matrimony and
bestiality?
Secondly,
when the biblical definition of marriage is tossed aside all types of biblically
unacceptable doors are opened up for exploration.
Many
readers of this article, have in their own lifetime seen a growing cultural
acceptance of men and women living together outside the bonds of marriage, the
growing permissibility of unbiblical divorce, and acceptability among many for
homosexual unions. It should not be surprising
that other types of sexual relationships will be explored and even advocated by
some.
What is the
answer? As Christians we must stand on
the objective truth and testimony of God’s word. Jesus Himself said, “Thy word is truth.”
(John 17:17) We must remember that God
ordained marriage. He defines marriage.
We read in Genesis 2:24, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and
mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.” We cannot settle for a different definition
of marriage.
We have to
realize that our culture gives Christians many opportunities to “redefine”
God’s definition of marriage.
One of our
relatives may enter into an unbiblical relationship. We may be informed that the two love each
other. Thus the relationship is made
right. We may be told that the two are
happy. Happiness is what counts isn’t
it? In each instance we have to turn to
Genesis 2:24 and begin with the fact of God’s definition of marriage. The “love” that the two have or the
“happiness” the two have does not allow us to redefine a biblical marital
relationship. Marital love and marital
happiness flow out of a biblical marital relationship, not by some other means.
I freely
admit there is a temporal pleasure in sin (Heb. 11:25). However, this pleasure is defined as
temporary and is not the pleasure for which God created us to have and
enjoy. Eph.5:22-23 as well as the Song
of Solomon speak of the joy of marital relationships. Eph. 5 in particular shows how the marital
relationship is to exemplify Christ’s relationship with His bride the
church.
We must
remember that man’s happiness, as defines happiness is not our chief goal. Our
chief goal is to bring glory to God and to enjoy Him forever. (See the
Given the
rampant degeneration of morality, we may be tempted to excuse some sins because
they are not as bad as other sins. For
example, we may hear of one night stands, ongoing affairs, or a man and woman
living together without the benefit of marriage. We might respond, “Well I would rather have
that then either one be involved in a homosexual relationship.” However, perverse sins do not allow other
sins to be redefined as a righteous act. Sin remains sin. God does not change the definition of
sin. Jesus defined lust for another
woman as adultery. (Mt. 5:28) Lust is
different from a sexual affair. However Jesus calls it adultery. It is a sin and off-limits. The incarnate
Christ walked on earth in a time of prostitution and marital
unfaithfulness. However these sins did
not result in His stating that lust in one’s heart is grudgingly permissible
because there are far more perverse ways to commit adultery. In the eyes of our holy triune God sin is
sin. God’s definitions of it remain unchanged.
We face all
sorts of temptations to water down our opposition to the seventh commandment.
Other forms of adultery may be promoted in the near future. We must be on guard
for ourselves and our children. We must
take every thought captive to God’s word in this and all areas. We must teach our children to do this also.
Review ©2007 Byron Snapp, Hampton, Virginia