©2006, Baker Books, 236 pp. in paperback

Sadly, too many evangelicals have obtained their view of the end times by reading popular eschatological fiction such as the Left Behind series or viewing a similar interpretation in visual media format. In this very readable volume, the author points the reader back to relevant scripture passages. He rightly believes a proper view of the end times must arise from one’s study of scripture.

He readily admits that studious Christians differ in the proper interpretation of these scriptures. He writes as a Reformed Christian and from an amillenial viewpoint. He treats with respect fellow Christians who differ with him on eschatology.

In the opening pages of this work Riddlebarger notes that scripture teaches that antichrists were present in the first century. He also points out that an antichrist is any individual who “denies the doctrine that Jesus Christ is God in human flesh.” (p. 21)

The author then turns the reader’s attention to Old Testament passages that provide insight not only to opposers of Christ prior to His incarnation but also to characteristics that will also be evident in that individual who will arise just prior to the world’s end. The author believes that this Antichrist will be vicious in his opposition of Christ. This leader will incorporate his animosity into his worldview thus it will affect all avenues of society.

Successive chapters examine New Testament usage of the terms Antichrist, the Dragon, the Beast, the False Prophet and the Man of Lawlessness. Relevant passages in John’s epistles and Revelation as well as Paul’s words in 2 Thessalonians are examined.  The author provides a helpful chart so that the reader can better understand the various interpretations of Paul’s eschatological passage in 2 Thessalonians.

A key to one’s interpretation of Revelation is the date it was authored. Many postmillennialists believe John was inspired to author the book prior to Jerusalem’s fall. From this view point, much of Revelation referred to events that surrounded the city’s capture. Those (such as Riddlebager) who hold to a date of authorship shortly prior to the end of the first century see the events of Revelation as still in the future. An appendix provides the reader with arguments for each of these two possibilities. As part of his reasoning for support of a late-date the author briefly answers arguments for an early date of authorship. This appendix provides the reader who is unaware of the varying dates proposed for authorship with some argumentation that can be further researched through books listed in the appendix.

This book brings together relevant eschatological passages and shows their importance and place in overall interpretation. It will provide the most help to those who have never done a study of eschatology from scripture. The work is very readable. A complex topic is presented with clarity. Readers can make use of the extensive bibliography the author provides and do further study.

Review ©2008 Byron Snapp, Hampton, Virginia